News from ISA


Call for Proposals: ISA Honolulu 2020

61st Annual Convention

Call for Proposals

March 25th - 28th, 2020, Honolulu, Hawaii
Cameron G. Thies, ISA President
Feliciano de Sá Guimarães and SooYeon Kim, Program Chairs
Submission Deadline: June 1st, 2019
(Proposal Guidelines Below)

Multiple Identities and Scholarship in a Global IR: One Profession, Many Voices

The International Studies Association, the primary organizational home for scholars studying international relations, has undergone enormous changes as it enters its seventh decade of existence. It began in 1959 as a small group of scholars located in the Western region of the United States. Today, its membership truly reflects the organization’s name with over 6600 members from over 100 countries. The membership’s composition has changed dramatically to include an increasing number of women, scholars from the Global South, LGBTQ persons, ethnic and racial diversity, a greater mix of academic positions (graduate students, postdocs, visiting and other forms of contingent faculty, alongside traditional faculty ranks), and practitioners. It also has expanded beyond political science to include a wide variety of academic disciplines. As we have grown, we have also sought to create niche intellectual groups within our organization. We now have 6 regions, 29 sections, and 4 caucuses with proposals every year to create more specialized groups within our larger global organization of International Studies scholars.
This diversity brings both challenges and opportunities to ISA that we wish to reflect upon in this call for papers. First, we can consider how our identities may shape the subjects of our studies, as well as our choice of ontology, epistemology, theory and methods. Many of us consider these issues in graduate school, then settle into the approaches of our mentors and rarely look back.
Second, we wish to consider the knowledge generated, as well as that to come, as a result of greater diversity in the association’s membership. For example:
  • What do we know about international relations as a result of women’s increased visibility in ISA? How can ISA further the visibility and voice of women in international relations?
  • What do we know about international relations as a result of the growing participation of Global South scholars in ISA? What measures can ISA take to further engage scholars from and in the Global South?
  • What do we know about international relations as a result of LGBTQ scholars’ visibility in ISA? What measures can ISA take to further engage scholars who are LGBTQ?
  • What do we know about international relations as a result of the growth of ethnic and racial diversity within ISA? How can ISA address issues related to ethnic and racial diversity in international relations in a concrete and practical way?
Third, we wish to reflect on how we value our scholarship as a result of this diversity, if or how we value particular axes of diversity, and how it can become more inclusive. Have some topics become less marginalized as a result of the increased empowerment of voices within ISA? For example, has research on gendered violence and transgressions against minorities, among other topics, increased in visibility as scholars in these communities have become less marginalized in international studies? What topics remain marginalized?
Fourth, is the knowledge gained on these topics confined to our smaller intellectual groups, or is it shared widely? How does knowledge formed in ISA’s subgroups get transmitted to the larger ISA community? What mechanisms enable the sharing and cumulation of knowledge and which ones are left to build or dismantle toward that end?
Fifth, do identities map onto theoretical, methodological, ontological, and epistemological positions? Do these identities reinforce debates, and pose hurdles to knowledge cumulation? Do these debates and positions reinforce identities? To the good or ill of scholarly progress?
Sixth, in terms of the intellectual identities represented by our many sections, how do they interact with other forms of identity to stimulate knowledge? Does the proliferation of sections lead to the disaggregation of knowledge with little aggregation once it is produced; meaning, do the knowledge claims produced in Foreign Policy Analysis ever cross into International Political Economy, or those in International Law cross into International Organization? What can we do at the organizational level to encourage such linkages across sections?
Seventh, what role should we seek for practitioners in our organization? While scholars may focus on basic research, practitioners are in the middle of adjudicating/translating academic and experiential knowledge. How can we foster this type of activity? ISA lags behind other professional associations in its incorporation of practitioners in our annual conference and other activities.
In sum, we seek to explore the interplay between our roles as experts, researchers, and subjects of our disciplines, and examine how these roles shape and are shaped by the field. We have maintained a growing, global group of international studies scholars for over 60 years. How do we build on this progress to make sure that we continue to do so for the future?
We encourage panels that take stock of progress (or the lack thereof) to date, those that stimulate bridge building, and those that leverage unique perspectives on traditional as well as emerging topics. We also seek panels that examine the identities of the discipline, the disciplining of identities, the co-constitution of personal identity and scholarly discovery, and those that bring diverse identities together in specific research areas.
Submit a Proposal

Types of Submissions

ISA's Governing Council and Program Chairs have defined the types of proposals we accept. In addition to the traditional types defined below, ISA accepts a number of specialty sessions including innovative panels and proposals to hold an instructor-led course on site. You can find out more about our submission types on our website.
  • Papers: Accepted papers will be formed into panels by our Program Chairs. They require a title (limited to 50 words), an abstract (limited to 200 words), three tags, and at least one author.
  • Panels: Panels are submitted in full with five papers for review by our Program Chairs. They require a title (limited to 50 words), an abstract (limited to 200 words), three tags, a chair, a discussant, and exactly five papers. Please note that we do not accept four or six paper panels.
  • Roundtables: Roundtables are submitted in full for review by our Program Chairs. They do not have papers and are designed for expert discussion on a topic. They require a title (limited to 50 words), an abstract (limited to 200 words), three tags, and at least three participants in addition to one chair.
  • Flash Talks and Junior Scholar Symposium: Flash Talk and JSS submissions are not separate submission types, but all individual papers can also be marked for consideration for these two programs (you'll find a check box at the bottom of the general tab in the submission form).
Learn More about Submission Types

Facebook   Twitter   Google +  RSS

Posted in: Annual Convention


There are currently no comments, be the first to post one.
Start the Discussion...
Only registered users may post comments.


ISA on Twitter


Newsletter Archive

Check out our newsletter archives here!


April 2021 (1)
March 2021 (2)
February 2021 (4)
January 2021 (6)
December 2020 (7)
November 2020 (3)
October 2020 (2)
September 2020 (4)
August 2020 (6)
July 2020 (5)
June 2020 (4)
May 2020 (11)
April 2020 (3)
March 2020 (9)
February 2020 (8)
January 2020 (4)
December 2019 (2)
November 2019 (3)
October 2019 (5)
September 2019 (6)
August 2019 (4)
July 2019 (3)
June 2019 (4)
May 2019 (11)
April 2019 (14)
March 2019 (7)
February 2019 (4)
January 2019 (5)
December 2018 (7)
November 2018 (2)
October 2018 (8)
September 2018 (8)
August 2018 (11)
July 2018 (8)
June 2018 (9)
May 2018 (10)
April 2018 (4)
March 2018 (1)
February 2018 (6)
January 2018 (1)
December 2017 (6)
November 2017 (1)
October 2017 (2)
September 2017 (11)
August 2017 (7)
July 2017 (10)
June 2017 (15)
May 2017 (13)
April 2017 (12)
March 2017 (8)
February 2017 (20)
January 2017 (9)
December 2016 (6)
November 2016 (8)
October 2016 (10)
September 2016 (19)
August 2016 (11)
July 2016 (14)
June 2016 (14)
May 2016 (19)
April 2016 (19)
March 2016 (11)
February 2016 (5)
January 2016 (11)
December 2015 (14)
November 2015 (8)
October 2015 (4)
September 2015 (15)
August 2015 (11)
July 2015 (16)
June 2015 (8)
May 2015 (15)
April 2015 (19)
March 2015 (14)
February 2015 (7)
January 2015 (9)
December 2014 (10)
November 2014 (4)
October 2014 (14)
September 2014 (12)
August 2014 (13)
July 2014 (8)
June 2014 (6)
May 2014 (16)
April 2014 (17)
March 2014 (8)
February 2014 (15)
January 2014 (9)
December 2013 (12)
November 2013 (9)
October 2013 (20)
September 2013 (24)
August 2013 (13)
July 2013 (8)
June 2013 (11)
May 2013 (5)
April 2013 (11)
March 2013 (3)
January 2013 (1)